Sechenov School
Home › Microbiology › Microbiological Examination of Respiratory Tract Secretions

Microbiological Examination of Respiratory Tract Secretions

For medical students2 min readUpdated 2026-10-10

Microbiological examination of respiratory secretions helps identify pathogens responsible for respiratory tract infections. The main challenge of this analysis is the inevitable contamination of samples by normal oral and upper respiratory flora, which requires strict adherence to preanalytical protocols and quantitative growth assessment.

TransportMaximum 1–2 hours from collection to inoculation
Sputum CollectionEarly morning sample following a deep cough
Throat SwabFasting state, without prior mouth rinsing
Clinical SignificanceGrade III–IV growth (abundant colonies) indicates the causative agent

General Preanalytical Principles

To investigate the causes of respiratory infections, clinicians use sputum, nasal and throat swabs, bronchial washings (obtained via bronchoscopy), or tracheal aspirates.

The primary requirement for all types of biological samples is strict aseptic technique during collection and the use of sterile containers. The time interval between sample collection and laboratory inoculation must not exceed 1–2 hours. Exceeding this timeframe allows normal flora, which inevitably contaminate the sample, to actively multiply. Furthermore, putrefactive and fermentative processes may begin, rendering the test results invalid.

Sputum Collection (Lower Respiratory Tract)

Sputum should be collected in the morning during a coughing fit into a sterile, tightly sealed container. It is essential to ensure that saliva does not enter the container. If sputum production is poor, expectorants may be prescribed the day before the test.

Before collecting the sample, the patient must:

Throat Swabs (Upper Respiratory Tract)

Unlike sputum collection, the patient must not rinse their mouth before a throat swab is taken. The procedure is performed either in a fasting state or 2–3 hours after eating or drinking.

The clinician depresses the tongue with a spatula and passes a sterile swab between the tonsillar pillars, across the uvula, and along the posterior pharyngeal wall. It is critical not to touch the lips, cheeks, or tongue to prevent the introduction of commensal flora from these areas. If purulent patches are present in the throat, the swab should be rubbed along the border between healthy and inflamed tissue—this is where bacteria accumulate most densely. After collection, the swab is immediately placed into a tube containing a specialized transport medium.

Alternative Collection Methods

If sputum is absent or insufficient, bronchial washings are used. During endoscopy, the bronchi are flushed with sterile normal saline, which is then aspirated and collected. However, this method has drawbacks: the secretions are heavily diluted, reducing bacterial concentration by a factor of 10 to 1,000 compared to standard sputum, and the saline itself may be detrimental to certain microbes. The procedure is also invasive and labor-intensive.

In cases of pulmonary infiltrates or abscesses, transthoracic needle aspiration is performed. This method is highly informative if the abscess has not yet ruptured into a draining bronchus. The obtained aspirate is inoculated onto nutrient media (blood agar, mannitol salt agar, Endo agar)—first rubbed onto a small area with a swab, and then streaked across the plate.

Interpretation of Results

Because the upper respiratory tract is heavily colonized by microorganisms under normal conditions, any sample passing through it inevitably becomes contaminated. Therefore, simply detecting a bacterium is insufficient; its quantity must be determined.

A semiquantitative method is used for evaluation by counting colonies on solid nutrient media:

A definitive diagnosis is established by considering the degree of colonization, the predominance of a single microbial species (monoculture), smear microscopy findings, and the clinical picture of the disease.

Frequently asked questions

What cytological criteria are used during smear microscopy to evaluate sputum suitability for bacteriological culture?

The suitability of sputum for microbiological analysis is assessed by the number of leukocytes and epithelial cells in a Gram-stained smear. Criteria for a quality sample examined under low magnification across at least 20 microscope fields include:

  • Neutrophils (segmented leukocytes) — more than 25 cells per low-power field.
  • Epithelial cells (squamous epithelial cells from the oropharynx) — fewer than 10 cells per low-power field.
  • Microorganisms — bacteria of a single morphological type predominate in the specimen.

If the smear contains numerous epithelial cells and few leukocytes, the examination is clinically uninformative due to the high risk of contamination by oral secretions.

Which bacterial pathogens are most frequently the true causative agents of lower respiratory tract infections?

Bacterial pathogens associated with pneumonia include:

Gram-positive bacteria:

  • Pneumococci (Streptococcus pneumoniae);
  • Streptococci (Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus viridans);
  • Staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus haemolyticus).

Gram-negative bacteria:

  • Haemophilus influenzae;
  • Klebsiella pneumoniae;
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa;
  • Escherichia coli;
  • Legionella pneumophila.

Atypical flora includes Mycoplasma and Chlamydia. In cases of hospital-acquired pneumonia, Acinetobacter spp. are also implicated.

Why is brushing teeth with toothpaste prohibited before sputum collection?

Toothpastes contain bactericidal agents that can destroy pathogenic microorganisms in the sample, leading to false-negative results.

What is the difference in patient preparation between sputum collection and a throat swab?

Prior to sputum collection, the patient must rinse the mouth with boiled water to remove oral flora. Before a throat swab, rinsing the mouth is strictly forbidden to avoid washing away the pathogen.

How can the true pathogen be distinguished from normal microflora in a sputum culture?

The primary criterion is the number of colonies grown. Abundant growth (Grades III and IV, more than 50 colonies) points to the pathogen, whereas sparse growth (up to 25 colonies) is considered normal flora contamination.

Go deeper

More topics in Microbiology

History of Russian MicrobiologyEnvironmental Factors Affecting MicroorganismsTransplant ImmunityAflatoxicosisGram-Negative Bacterial Cell WallBacterial Culture ConditionsRestriction AnalysisMechanisms of Action of Antimicrobial DrugsInnate Immunity CellsAnaerobic Gram-Negative Cocci: VeillonellaMoraxellaPropionibacteriumMicrobiology →