Sechenov School
Home › Physiology › Systemic Principle of Behavior Organization

Systemic Principle of Behavior Organization

For medical students3 min readUpdated 2026-10-10

Behavior is built upon functional systems, where the primary goal is not the action itself, but an adaptive result beneficial to the organism. Unlike reflex theory, the systemic approach explains how internal needs unite physiological processes to solve specific biological or social tasks.

Main goalAchieving an adaptive result that satisfies a need
System driverDominant motivation gathers elements into a unified structure
LocalizationUnlike homeostasis, the behavioral result is typically located outside the organism
Fixation speedSuccessful integration is consolidated immediately after the first achievement of the goal

Difference from Reflex Theory

Classical reflex theory posits that an organism's response is organized along the reflex principle, terminating in a reaction to an external stimulus—namely, the reflected action itself. Analysis stops there.

The theory of functional systems goes fundamentally further: it does not stop at the action. For survival and adaptation, the organism cares not about motor acts per se, but about achieving a useful adaptive result. The system extends its analysis precisely to the point of need satisfaction.

Need and Motivation as the Basis of the System

Biological and social needs lie at the core of any behavioral activity. They act as system-forming and system-mobilizing factors that:

However, as I.M. Sechenov noted, needs and motivations alone cannot fully form a functional system. Hunger may drive an animal to get up and search passionately for food, but this motivation alone contains no ready-made instruction on how exactly to acquire that food. Interaction with the external environment is required.

Result as the Leading Factor of Behavior

Behavioral-level system formation relies on two components: the result itself and the action result acceptor (the apparatus of prediction and evaluation).

Features of a behavioral result:

Fixation mechanism: As soon as the subject achieves the goal, a useful integration of physiological processes forms and is immediately consolidated. Example: A newborn calf spends a few minutes in chaotic trials trying to stand. But as soon as it manages to maintain an upright posture (achieving the result), the successful muscle integration is fixed. The second attempt to stand will take only a matter of seconds.

Experimental Evidence for the Role of the Result

Behavior is determined not by a set of external stimuli, but by the internal need for an adaptive result.

  1. Predator-prey model: A hungry cat actively catches a mouse to satisfy its feeding need. If the cat is fed (or lacks hunting experience), it will not react to the exact same stimuli. Without a need, external stimuli do not trigger behavior.
  2. Porter's canary experiment: A bird with clipped wings needs to reach suspended food. Initially, it makes unsuccessful attempts (purely reflex stage). Then it reorganizes its behavior: it uses children's blocks lying in the room, builds a pyramid, and climbs to the food. Hunger, past experience, motor skills, and environmental assessment merged into a unified system.
  3. Social interactions: In a game of chess, the hand movements themselves are less important than the intermediate and final results leading to a socially significant goal—victory.

Behavior in a Social Environment and Extreme Situations

The significance of the result is clearly seen in zoosocial and human activity.

Chimpanzee example (Jane Goodall): A low-ranking monkey, running away from a dominant individual, accidentally hits an empty barrel, producing a loud bang that frightens the herd. The animal assesses the situation and subsequently uses the barrel purposefully for intimidation. Achieving this new result changes the structure of the entire colony: the outcast becomes the leader.

Extreme situations (confined space, hypoxia): Group human behavior dynamics always obey a single law:

  1. Primary (reflex) stage: Chaotic vocal and motor reactions and panic occur. They do not lead to salvation.
  2. Secondary (goal-directed) stage: A strict functional system is formed. Efforts are concentrated on achieving a useful result (breaking down a door, finding a key).

This same principle explains the evolution of tools: the needle or wheel changed shape over centuries, but survived in history because they invariably provided the required adaptive result.

Frequently asked questions

What nodal mechanisms make up the central architecture of a behavioral act according to P.K. Anokhin?

The central architecture of a behavioral act consists of several sequential and interrelated nodal stages, including:

  • Afferent synthesis — the initial stage of information processing, including motivation, memory, and situational afferentation.
  • Decision making — the formation of a dominant behavioral line with the elimination of redundant degrees of freedom.
  • Action result acceptor — the apparatus for predicting and evaluating the future result.
  • Efferent synthesis — the organization of the action itself and formation of the efferent program.

The architecture also includes triggering afferentation and feedback (reverse) afferentation, which provides information about the actually obtained result for comparison.

What is the action result acceptor and how is it formed in the CNS?

The action result acceptor is an apparatus for predicting the properties of the required result and the methods leading to its achievement. It is constructed under the influence of prior reinforcements (the experience of successful need satisfaction).

Interneurons in various parts of the brain form the basis of this apparatus. Formation occurs before the action begins: when cortical pyramidal neurons form efferent commands for effector organs, copies of these commands propagate via collaterals of the pyramidal tract to interneurons. Due to cyclic relationships within this group of neurons, a predictive model of the expected result is created, against which incoming feedback afferentation is subsequently compared.

Which brain structures act as pacemakers for biological motivations?

The motivational centers of the hypothalamus play a pacemaker role in generating primary biological motivations.

By analogy with the sinus node of the heart, hypothalamic centers control structures at other levels of the brain and keep them in morphological and functional dependence. Motivational excitation originating primarily in the hypothalamus spreads to the limbic system and reticular formation, and through them to the cerebral cortex. Inactivation of hypothalamic centers leads to the disintegration of the system of elements united in motivational excitation, while destruction of these centers eliminates biological motivations.

Does an external stimulus trigger behavior on its own?

No, without a dominant need (e.g., hunger), an external stimulus will not lead to goal-directed behavior. This is proven by the experiment with a well-fed cat that ignores a mouse.

How does behavior change in an extreme situation?

Useless reflex reactions (fuss, shouting) predominate initially. They are then replaced by goal-directed actions—a system is formed to achieve a result (e.g., escaping danger).

Go deeper

More topics in Physiology

Thresholds and Laws of PerceptionProtein MetabolismThermogenesis: Physiological Mechanisms of Heat ProductionVisual PigmentsAnokhin's Theory of Functional SystemsEvaluation of Action Results in Functional SystemsPosture Regulation and Brainstem ReflexesProperties and Structure of Motivational ArousalReverberation of ExcitationPeripheral Theory of EmotionsBody Response to PainMethods for Studying Work MovementsPhysiology →