Free clinical calculators and scores for physicians and medical students · Browse all calculators
← All calculators and scores
Emergency and Critical Care

Revised Geneva Score for Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Clinical probability of PE (Revised Geneva Score)

Primary source: Le Gal G et al. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(3): 165-171

Last clinical review: April 28, 2026

Online calculation

Age > 65 years
Prior DVT or PE
Surgery or fracture within the past month
Active malignancy
Unilateral lower limb pain
Hemoptysis
Heart rate
Pain on deep vein palpation and unilateral edema

About this score

The revised Geneva score (Le Gal G et al., Ann Intern Med, 2006) is an alternative to the Wells score for estimating the pretest probability of PE. Its main advantage is the absence of the subjective item "PE is more likely than an alternative diagnosis," which makes it more reproducible across clinicians of varying experience.

The score uses 8 parameters: age > 65 years (1), prior DVT/PE (3), surgery or fracture within the past month (2), active malignancy (2), unilateral lower limb pain (3), hemoptysis (2), heart rate 75-94/min (3), heart rate ≥ 95/min (5), pain on calf palpation with unilateral edema (4).

Interpretation: 0-3 points - low probability, 4-10 - intermediate, ≥ 11 - high. A simplified two-level version also exists: 0-5 - PE unlikely, ≥ 6 - PE likely. This score is recommended by the ESC 2019 guidelines alongside the Wells score.

When to use

Clinical example

Case

72-year-old man with active colon cancer on chemotherapy. Reports dyspnea for 2 days. Heart rate 102/min, BP 130/85, SpO₂ 93%. Left calf swollen and tender on palpation. No hemoptysis.

Calculation

Age > 65 (1) + malignancy (2) + heart rate ≥ 95 (5) + calf tenderness with unilateral edema (4) = 12 points.

Interpretation and management

High pretest probability. Proceed directly to CT pulmonary angiography without waiting for D-dimer. Simultaneously obtain lower extremity duplex ultrasound. If contrast is contraindicated, consider ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy.

Limitations and cautions

Frequently asked questions

What is the advantage over the Wells score?
All parameters are objective - there is no "PE more likely" item requiring clinical judgment. Interrater reproducibility is higher.
Which version should be used?
The two-level version (0-5 / ≥ 6) is recommended by the ESC 2019 guidelines as sufficiently accurate and simpler for clinical practice.
Can it be used in pregnant patients?
Specialized algorithms are recommended (YEARS-pregnancy, Pregnancy-Adapted Geneva score). The standard Geneva score is not validated in pregnancy.
What counts as "active malignancy"?
Treatment within the past 6 months or palliative care. Remission longer than 6 months is not counted.

All clinical calculators in one place

Validated scores and formulas with full interpretation, clinical examples and source references. Open access, no registration required.

65+ calculators · scores and formulas · interpretation with management notes

АА
Aleksandr A. Aulov Physician, internal medicine, Sechenov School — independent medical education platform. Calculators are compiled from the original publications and current clinical guidelines. Interpretation thresholds follow the source study unless stated otherwise.
This calculator is intended for healthcare professionals. Do not use it for self-diagnosis or self-treatment. Management decisions are made by the treating clinician based on the full clinical picture of the individual patient.